this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
528 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
2191 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RoadRunner451 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is not a purely theoretical question. in practice, autonomous vehicles face exactly this dilemma. or rather the manufacturers of the vehicles who have to set the specifications

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I forget where it was from but years ago I found an online survey on autonomous cars and their decision making from a university. It was all about deciding to swerve or not in a collision. All kinds of difficult encounters like do you hit the barrier and kill the passenger or swerve and kill the old lady? Do you hit thin person or serve and hit the heavier person?

I've never seen a survey drill down into biases quite so deeply.

[–] TheYear2525 4 points 1 year ago

Easy. Prioritize who is saved based on social credit score.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

From what I've seen of real world examples, not "what if the car had 5 cats in it and the person on the crosswalk had a stroller full of 6 cat, swerve into a barricade?", telsa cars just release control of the autonomous controls to the person behind the wheel a few seconds before impact so the driver is fully liable.

[–] HappycamperNZ 2 points 1 year ago

I did this as a part of our ethics discussion.

My eventual answer was you always kill the non-driver as no one would ever buy a car that will kill them over someone else.