UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1313 readers

2 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

[email protected]

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone

HM05_Me

How has the media's coverage changed the public's perspective on UFOs? | Morning in America - NewsNation (www.youtube.com)

submitted 2 years ago by SignullGone to c/uap

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally, I am noticing a change, albeit measured, in the coverage and seriousness given to this topic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dub 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did anything even come from this other than the same ambiguous nonsense every time they do this? Bunch of half answers, no evidence, and 3rd party sightings. Wake me up when the actual white house does an emergency broadcast on this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did anything even come from this

Yes, a lot of the lose claims that have been floating around as rumor over the last 70 years have now been formally made under oath in a hearing. I see that as a potential step in the direction of disclosure of what the deep state knows about the phenomena, no matter what it might be.

Wake me up when the actual white house does an emergency broadcast on this.

Then I have to warn you that you might not enjoy this community. 🤷 I think there's going to be a lot of posting and discussions with speculations about unproven claims, media analysis of the same claims and so on.

But I still think there's a lot of interesting discussions to be had unrelated to weather any information is disclosed or not.

If you believe the phenomenon is real, is there anything people like us can do to help bringing out the truth and maybe even politically force the White House to acknowledge the phenomenon and force through public investigations?

If you believe the phenomenon is not real, is there anything people like you can do to help us all understand what is actually is?

[–] grabyourmotherskeys 2 points 2 years ago

This is a great way to work with people who are skeptical but more closed of than open minded. Really, these people are in the majority and we should regard this attitude as reasonable and normal.

I was in a discussion today and someone really confidently affirmed that Alcubierre were impossible because we don't currently have the required technology. I pointed out that when von Neumann probes were initially thought of, AI and 3d printing were largely theoretical but here we are with these technologies ready to go. I chose those this because that is what I think the most reasonable origin is uap is.