this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
11 points (92.3% liked)

Edmonton

441 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy community for the City of Edmonton in Alberta, Canada. We encourage posts with Edmonton related original content, such as stories, news, events, hot discussion topics, and discussions with like-minded others who may share your obscure interest or hobby.

Rules

  1. Racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination are not cool. Please report it, don't support it.

  2. Don't editorialize headlines. Please keep the original title of article submissions, don't editorialize.

  3. We are not Kijiji or Craigslist. We do allow buying/selling posts, job-seeking threads, or posts made to find companionship, but please keep it civil.

  4. Lost and found posts are allowed. Hopefully we can help you find your mitten, cat, car, or travel mug!

  5. No Low Content/Offtopic Posts A post to c/edmonton must be substantially awesome. Any post that is low effort, a repost, low quality, or irrelevant to c/edmonton can be removed without warning, but it will likely stay and we'll make fun of it.

  6. No Uncivil behaviour, Insults, personal attacks, and veiled insults to get around this rule.

  7. No Spam or Referrals Spamming a business, spamming a referral link, spamming an app, spamming coupons or "Free credit".

Related Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
11
Keith Gerein: The City of Edmonton has another problematic project you've likely never heard of (edmontonjournal.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Keeping up with the City of Edmonton tradition of project management.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brenticus 4 points 1 year ago

I am far from a technologically-savvy person — certain buttons on my 10-year-old TV remote still confound me — but it seems to me there is a real question here about how much of this dysfunction was inevitable and how much could have been avoided with better planning.

Honestly, having been impacted by processes like these and been involved in planning and building portions of smaller-scale rebuilds... It's basically inevitable. Legacy systems often aren't designed in ways that make it clean or predictable to integrate with other software or migrate to a new platform, and with 70 legacy government systems I would be impressed if they only ended up at double the initial predictions.

Could it be planned better? Sure, but you can easily spend so much time in planning that the goalposts end up moving by the time you start working. With these sorts of projects it's like being handed a ball of tangled cables: yeah, there are strategies to untangle things nicely, but just tugging at it until you get an idea of where the worst knots are is usually just as fast.