this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
151 points (98.1% liked)

BrainWorms

1227 readers
142 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's access to money you have already earned, is in the bank, you own, and Mastercard is saying you can’t spend it on a particular thing.

Strictly speaking, they're saying that they won't facilitate the transaction themselves, presumably because they're concerned about legal exposure from processing transactions for goods that are illegal under federal law. State law may not be restricting your access, but federal still is, at least on paper, even if it's largely de facto unenforced.

Mastercard makes money every time you swipe a card. They're not going to cut off their own income unless they think the cost of not doing doing so is higher, such as legal exposure.

I agree that I don't love how much control a few private companies have over the financial system, but at least with this case, I think the real issue is Congress for not getting around to legalizing Marijuana.