this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
8 points (68.2% liked)

Vivaldi Browser

698 readers
11 users here now

A community for Vivaldi - the private, customizable and powerful browser.

Rules

  1. Stay on topic
  2. Behave yourself
  3. No trolling, spamming etc.
  4. Follow lemmy.ml's code of conduct

Useful Links

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am a little disappointed that Vivaldi did not do so well in this test. What do you think? Is there a way to improve Vivaldi in these areas? Is it necessary? Should privacy-conscious people use another browser?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

privacytests.org is ran by a guy who works at Brave, and they test all browsers in default settings, so for Firefox and Vivaldi all the tracking protection is turned off hence why they do not score well. Vivaldi with the settings turned on and Ublock Origin installed in my opinion is better than Brave.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave have proven many times over that they are not trustworthy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are shady in a lot of their activities, but I haven't seen anything of substance that invalidates the privacy or security of the browser itself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The browser may reasonably secure right now, however the company behind the browser isn't trustworthy. There are better options out there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Searching for "Brave controversy" should bring up some of them. Basically over the years they've done various controversial things like enabling bitcoin mining by default, automatically including referrals in search or substituting their own ads. There was another much more recently, but I forget what that was. In the past, these controversies were followed by the CEO going on a marketing campaign and speaking to users on social media - the new users typically drowned out the controversy.

They're not a massively evil company, but my general impression is that they're very fickle and it would only take a relatively small sack of money for them to sell their users up the river.

Edit: I should also add that some of these things were added with little to no announcement. They were caught doing it the link referrals stuff, it wasn't included in the update changelog.