United States Politics

I recently subscribed to Ground News, a news aggregator site that rates news sources to left, leans left, center, leans right, and right.
It also rates their outlets to being partially accurate or highly accurate. GN also report and who owns the outlets, to give a window to biases by owners.

My personal bias is to being factually accurate and honest, far more than the red/blue/green divides.

Sadly, discourse is such that being accurate is a right filter, leaving far fewer right outlets that can be trusted. For example, I have found that RT is more often correct than some of these outlets. Why? If RT propagandists throw in truthful news, they gain credibility, which buoys their credibility for when they break to full propaganda.
In a same vein, 60+ lawsuits were foisted in the last election over fake votes, with every single one thrown out by not having any evidence to support their accusations. But I still hear someone BSing those lies. But whadaboutism accusing Biden is still innuendo, without proof, and most importantly, does not excuse others to be free to break laws.
If Joe Biden took money from foreign interests, for himself, via Hunter, he would deserve prosecution, too.

Finding any balance that to a so-called center is still half crazy, which is not good enough.

Fox News was sued and famously paid 3/4 of a billion dollars to pay damages for their lies, and more lawsuits are coming. Pulitzer prize winning magazines and newspapers deserve greater weight for truthfulness, while I would argue, Fox News and RT should be banned. They simply cannot be trusted.