this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
483 points (78.0% liked)

Memes

46039 readers
3385 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
483
quick reminder (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by hairinmybellybutt to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Asafum 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There would generally be mandatory meetings for workers to attend that would allow for debates on the trajectory of the company. The state would "own" it but the workers would still direct it.

In a very very small way, it is like what Germany does with large corporations. They require a percentage of the board of directors be actual workers so it's not just a bunch of capitalist parasites making decisions that would hurt workers just to boost their own portfolios/profits.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The word 'union' kind of brings more ring to the "workers' ownership" in that case. 'State' sounds spooky.

Your example is unheard to me tho. Kinda interesting how it works out.