this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
82 points (98.8% liked)

Plex

2401 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Plex, a community dedicated to Plex, the media server/client solution for enjoying your media!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Been building this server up for about 5 years, adding hard drives as needed.

Running unraid

E5-2698 v3
64gb ddr4 ecc
X99-E WS
P600 for transcoding
10gbit networking w/ 3gbit fibre WAN
15 HDDs of assorted sizes, totally 148TB, 132TB usable

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it comes to a fileserver, I still prefer Truenas.

I've freenas/Truenas for 10 or so years now and unraid for about 5. For the last year I've been working on migrating everything back to Truenas (scale in my case)

Some of my pain points with unraid:

  • disk read speeds. (Since read is only ever happening from a single disk, it's much easier to notice bottlenecks)
  • disk replacement. When a disk fails, I find the process of replacing the disk (or decideding to not replace the disk and scatter the data across the remaining disks) fairly tricky and honestly a little scary. I've had to do it twice now and it's the biggest reason I'm now only using unraid to run services but not store any important data.
  • cache disks are meh. Over the years I've had 3 or 4 times where the mover just stopped, which resulted in a cache disks filling and not flushing to HDDs, which then corrupted some database or file an application was using. Like on one hand you have to use SSD cache disks to run apps or VMs since there is no way to speed up read speeds on HDDs, but on the other it just doesn't work well given enough time.

Some pros:

  • Application/service hosting is still great in unraid. It's still a pain in the ass getting a VM running on Truenas scale, but with Truenas Scale you can run docker directly.

  • being able to just add single disks at a time in unraid is nice (until you need to replace one...)


Anyway that's my off the top of my head reasoning. Truenas is a little more work to use overall, but I've found it much more stable

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds a bit like a clown raid if you ask me. It's as if it wasn't designed to be robust under production loads. ๐Ÿค”