this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
17 points (90.5% liked)

Yes in my backyard!

328 readers
3 users here now

In this community, we believe in saying yes to:

Typical YIMBY policies include:

Typical housing crisis "solutions" YIMBYs are wary of:

YIMBYism transcends the typical left-right political divide; please be respectful of fellow YIMBYs with differing political views. That said, please report anyone saying anything hateful or bigoted.

Reading List

Viewing List

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let's try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Additionally, it is preferred (although not mandatory) to post a brief submission statement in the body of link posts. This is just to give a brief summary and/or description of why you think it's relevant here. Hopefully this will encourage more discussion in this community.

Recommended Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Fried_out_Kombi
17
[article] Liberal Suburbs Have Their Own Border Wall | The Atlantic (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Fried_out_Kombi to c/yimby
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Non-paywalled link: https://archive.is/Mnsj4

The New York City suburb of Scarsdale, located in Westchester County, New York, is one of the country’s wealthiest communities, and its residents are reliably liberal. In 2020, three-quarters of Scarsdale voters cast ballots for Joe Biden over Donald Trump. One can safely presume that few Scarsdale residents are ardent backers of Trump’s wall on the Mexican border. But many of them support a less visible kind of wall, erected by zoning regulations that ban multifamily housing and keep non-wealthy people, many of them people of color, out of their community.

Across the country, a lot of good white liberals, people who purchase copies of White Fragility and decry the U.S. Supreme Court for ending affirmative action, sleep every night in exclusive suburbs that socially engineer economic (and thereby racial) segregation by government edict. The huge inequalities between upscale municipalities and their poorer neighbors didn’t just happen; they are in large measure the product of laws that are hard to square with the inclusive In This House, We Believe signs on lawns in many highly educated, deep-blue suburbs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fried_out_Kombi 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think the author's point is that these wealthy, liberal suburbs are intentionally excluding black people from their neighborhoods. I think their point is that there is a certain hypocrisy to these people who evidently present themselves as inclusive and welcoming and socially progressive, but who support policies whose net effect is massively exclusionary. It may not have the spittle of a red-hatter shouting, "We need to build a wall!", but the effect zoning policies have on inequality and de facto segregation is difficult to overstate.

I think the point of the article is simply to call attention to the harmful web of strict zoning laws cities and suburbs across America have and their effects, and the angle of "liberal suburb hypocrisy" is a compelling angle for exploring this issue. If anything, motivating a sense of hypocrisy might be a good way to finally get people to rethink zoning, at least amongst the very people who put up "in this house, we believe" signs. I suspect most people who put up such signs care very deeply that they're perceived as progressive, and articles like this can help point out that those policies they support are anything but progressive.

Edit: I think the article serves as a good reminder that, while progress may be effectively deadlocked at the federal level for the foreseeable future, there's still a ton of systemic issues that need to be fixed in (and pertaining to) progressives' backyards. Sure we won't likely see a sane SCOTUS again for years, nor will we see universal healthcare, nor will we see lobbying abolished, or climate change solved... or much of anything on a long list of federal issues. But we still have massive local issues, even in overwhelmingly blue cities and districts, that are feeding the status quo of inequality, de facto segregation, and the housing crisis.