this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
1415 points (77.7% liked)

Memes

45617 readers
1094 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's funny because if you look at living standards in eastern Europe during communism's peak they were wayyy better than they are now

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They had public transit, jobs, and housing for all.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And when people who actually lived in these area during that period almost ALL of them say communism was better! But OP and their ilk would rather focus on the imaginary eastern Europeans in their head, or perhaps the gusanos whose family 'fled' to the west after their fiefdom got collectivized

[–] HerbalGamer 10 points 1 year ago

Easier to make it seem bad if you were born in that area after 1980ish and washing it all down as Bad Communism instead of the Capitalism that actually made it this way.

[–] gxgx55 -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And when people who actually lived in these area during that period almost ALL of them say communism was better!

Lol. Almost all of my grandparents and greatgrandparents disagreed and personally told me about their life during USSR occupation, and the two that don't were well connected with officials and generally lived much better than the average person, enjoying vacations to Cuba frequently, something tue average person could never afford.

Everyone else just lived in pretty poor, if stable, conditions. None of that "communism = starve to death" meme nonsense that some try to push, but it just wasn't good. After fall of the USSR, things went worse before they became better, but now things are significantly better for the average person.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Everyone else just lived in pretty poor, if stable, conditions.

That's the thing, they lived in a poor country. Not strictly because of their political system (as many flaws as it had), but because of global economics, and trade hostility from the USA that intentionally hampered growth. It's not like they were purposely kept poor for funsies or cause the government were big meanies (sure, they were meanies in other ways). The wealth inequality between modern political leaders and funding sources (where the real power comes from) and the average citizen (particularly in the USA) is far greater than it ever was in the USSR.

Things are better for some and worse for many since then in Russia, but in other places like Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova everyone lost except for the rich guys who pillaged all the private infrastructure.

[–] FluffyPotato 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol no. I'm in Eastern Europe, living standards are way better now. The only good thing the USSR did here was trains and houses and those are better now. Those 2 was not worth death camps and criminalisation of my culture and language.

[–] MindSkipperBro12 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why they built to Berlin Wall to keep all of those westerns from entering East Germany, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They were still worse off than western europe

To quote a random politician who was talking about the eastern Germany wall: "Capitalism might not be perfect but at least we don't have to build a wall to keep our citizens in"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Capitalist citizens tend to do better because their private organizations & government are willing to oppress the people in other parts of the world in order to extract their wealth. Communists respect the lives of poor people and refuse to take advantage of that, or oppress them further.

If a capitalist nation is completely cut off from the rest of the world they become fascist very quickly (Germany, middle east, etc. etc.), when a communist nation is cut off from the rest of the world they become poor (Cuba, USSR, East Germany, etc. etc.).

I don't think the argument of "I'm rich therefore I'm better than you" is really a strong one.

When all else is equal, life is better under communism for the vast majority of people, just not the wealthy people of capitalist nations. But even for the capitalist "middle class", when it comes to the essentials (Food, water, housing, healthcare, equality among women, minorities, etc.), communists still beat capitalists.

[–] MaxVoltage 2 points 1 year ago

excelente point my dude

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a capitalist nation is completely cut off from the rest of the world they become fascist very quickly (Germany, middle east, etc. etc.), when a communist nation is cut off from the rest of the world they become poor (Cuba, USSR, East Germany, etc. etc.).

North Korea (communist) got cut off from the rest of the world and they became poor AND fascist (well not fascist, they became worse than fascist)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And I'm sure you're an independent reporter from a neutral country that doesn't benefit culturally from propaganda making communism look like fascism...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Funny that you bring up East Germany, since they had some of the best living standards in all of Europe in general. Universal healthcare, right to a job, free daycare AND over a year of maternity AND paternity leave?? Come on. The Berlin Wall was to stop tourism and trade as a tactic in the cold war, it's not like people were fleeing to West Germany (where many former Nazis were still in power) in droves. Dubious morally for sure, but not what you claim it to be. Maybe that random politician you're quoting benefitted from the corrupt system he was endorsing? In the words of Assata Shakur, don't let your enemies tell you who your enemies are,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

it's not like people were fleeing to West Germany (where many former Nazis were still in power) in droves

They were though, when it was announced that the Berlin wall would shut down everybody was pretty much camping outside and the guards had to remind people that it would only happen at midnight through force

[–] MaxVoltage 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

a yes the mexican border wall the perfect example.

capitalist mexico and central america sure can keep people in their country 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

a yes the mexican border wall the perfect example.

? I'm talking about the Berlin wall

capitalist mexico and central america sure can keep people in their country 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Not because of capitalism, because of corruption, etc. Anyway, they try to escape to other capitilist countries

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When stuff goes poorly in a socialist regime it's always "this is proof of socialisms short comings and shows the inherent inhumanity of such an ideology!" but when it comes to capitalism it's always "individual people who are corrupted misused the system to do harm, and yeah it keeps happening but it's not an inherent trait of our system!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

It is a trait of our system, noone said capitalism is perfect, its just better than communism

[–] MindSkipperBro12 1 points 1 year ago

I think that may have been JFK

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The public actively spying and ratting each other out was a nice bonus.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Thank GOD capitalist countries don't have spies and police informants...

[–] MaxVoltage 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

karen calls 911 on black man

this happens here more

try again