this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
209 points (97.7% liked)

Games

16948 readers
606 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
209
Meta cancels Quest Pro, stops development of Quest Pro 2 | ZDNET (www.zdnet.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Friend. Nothing about technology make anything simpler. It’s all about efficiency

[–] dojan 2 points 1 year ago

Fair, but I don't see how navigating a virtual three-dimensional mall is going to be more efficient than just ordering stuff online.

The up-side of visiting a real mall would be the ability to view objects, touch them, smell them, and so forth. You're also be able to purchase the object on the spot and bring it home with you. VR doesn't really offer that though. Maybe you'd get a rough idea of the size of an object but you wouldn't be able to say, try it on or smell it, and you'd still have to wait for it to be delivered to you.