this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
18 points (80.0% liked)

World News

32328 readers
726 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they did that, the USA would sanction the USA. Can't have those Marxist-Sanderists thinking they own the place.

[–] megahertz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I feel like I might understand some of the impulse to restrict resources as a way to ensure all members contribute to society, we can see that this isn't actually the outcome of such restrictions; this tells me that the motivation isn't about improving society but rather improving the standing of a select few. It is all about power and control. How do we change the social structure at this point?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do we change the social structure at this point?

Here's an idea that worked in the past!

[–] megahertz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we keep finding ourselves in another iteration of the problem, did it really work? There has to be a more permanent solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Care to explain the "another iteration of the problem"? Abolishing slavery ends slavery, abolishing serfdom ends serfdom, abolishing rent ends rent. The Venezuelan case is an example of the latter. You asked how to change the social structure, here's a tried and true method that has worked from Russia to China to Vietnam to Cuba. You're free to present your own with better track records.

[–] megahertz 1 points 1 year ago

I see I was looking at the conversation from a wider perspective and likely misunderstood the context added by the image. I don't disagree with your comment "abolishing 'x' ends 'x'". However, abolishing any given inequity, one at a time, in one area at a time is not the progress I was speaking of when I asked how to change social structure. Before we can abolish anything, we need people who believe it should be abolished, and we need enough of them to institute change. My question was directed more toward the earlier steps: identifying necessary change and then creating/maintaining a movement which can enact that change.