Asklemmy

44151 readers

1102 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1181

How many Lemmy users are non-technical background? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

643 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think most all of us here on Lemmy are people with technical background. Most of my professional contacts remained using Reddit, Twitter and even excited when Threads launched.

If you are non-tech background, please comment and share what you do for life.

If you have tech background, upvote this to help promote this post so that we can find more non-tech users on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AlaskaMan 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I often nervously wonder what will happen when society hits the post-growth phase and worry about what will happen to the stock markets since our retirement depends on it.

[–] Kiki 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The transition is what is scary and complicated with post-growth and that is very much understandable... Because we can envision how it would look like, but for this, systemic change is needed, and we know how well changing everything at the same time is impossible and/or won't go the way we envisioned it at first. And pensions are not working the same everywhere, so transitions wouldn't be the same everywhere too.

Couple references though about transforming pension schemes and how a different monetary system would contribute to it too, hope it may help already! (Second one is a PhD dissertation, but the guy already published articles, at least the dissertation is open access!):

https://degrowth.org/2023/04/04/modern-monetary-theory-a-vehicle-to-for-change-2/

https://theses.hal.science/tel-03921258/document

[–] AlaskaMan 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this! I will dig into those references over the weekend. Hopefully they provide a little peace of mind. Cheers.