Asklemmy

43755 readers

2200 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

143

What is your boomer opinion (lemmy.one)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

439 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Basically any opinion of the modern Internet I give.

I'm a certified computer expert, but I sound like a Luddite when it comes to anything mainstream.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I noticed a lot of people who pay attention to modern internet privacy seem to sound like Luddites these days...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m a certified computer expert, but I sound like a Luddite when it comes to anything mainstream.

I thought it was pretty well known that the magnitude of one’s ludditism related to their computing expertise as a U-shaped curve. That is, (actual) experts and non-experts are equally Luddite. It’s the mediocre and peri- technologists that drive hype. Right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hah, I haven't heard that analogy before, but I see what it's getting at. I wouldn't say it's a rule to live by, but as you learn more about technology you (usually) also learn more about its constant abuse and its critical flaws.

It’s the mediocre and peri- technologists that drive hype. Right?

I'm not sure exactly who you mean, but never believe the hype:

Steve Jobs didn't know shit about computers and took the fame from people who did, just like Edison and Musk.
Most people studied in machine learning hate the term "Artificial Intelligence", it's a marketing gimmick used by marketing.
There's a similar, but lesser, sentiment in security being called "cyber".
Anything saying "better privacy" or "more secure" without giving a specific threat scenario (like, more secure against [x] attack) - they don't know shit. Privacy and security are not linear values you can have more or less of.
Internet of Things ('smart devices') is a privacy and security NIGHTMARE, and we've known that since day 1. Companies don't care. It's easy money.
If you can't (hypothetically) run it yourself, you're the product.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you can’t (hypothetically) run it yourself, you’re the product.

This is the nightmare of everything today, technology exists to prevent you from "doing it yourself". Try to repair anything modern.