this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
414 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

64088 readers
8077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TsarVul 73 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

I'm a little defeatist about it. I saw with my own 3 eyes how a junior asked ChatGPT how to insert something into an std::unordered_map. I tell them about cppreference. The little shit tells me "Sorry unc, ChatGPT is objectively more efficient". I almost blew a fucking gasket, mainly cuz I'm not that god damn old. I don't care how much you try to convince me that LLMs are efficient, there is no shot they are more efficient than opening a static page with all the info you would ever need. Not even considering energy efficiency. Utility aside, the damage we have dealt to developing minds is irreversible. We have convinced them that thought is optional. This is gonna bite us in the ass. Hard.

[–] _g_be 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

How is it more efficient than reading a static page? The kids can't read. They weren't taught phonics, they were taught to guess the word with context clues. It's called "whole language" or "balanced reading"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think phonics are the most critical part of why the kids can't read.

It's proven that people who read primarily books and documents read thoroughly, line by line and with understanding, while those that primarily read from screens (such as social media) skip and skim to find certain keywords. This makes reading books (such as documentation) hard for those used to screens from a young age and some believe may be one of the driving forces behind the collapse in reading amongst young people.

If you're used to the skip & skim style of reading, you will often miss details, which makes finding a solution in a manual infinitely frustrating.

[–] _g_be 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's not that phonics is integral, but rather if reading is a guessing game that's just one more barrier to reading, and they read less, and what they do read they skim over and potentially ignore foreign words

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)