this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
332 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

61969 readers
3747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Nice to see! Baby steps and all that. Getting RISC-V to a consumer-level state is still a pretty gargantuan task that has a lot of catch-up to do, but it's walking along its path steadily.

[–] buzz86us -2 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I would have rather seen an ARM Linux board for a more modest cost

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

From what I can see, arm Linux itself is still a very small market so I don't see how a small company could work on it and make a profit from that. Maybe once it becomes more mainstream and there is a bigger demand for it, they would definitely consider it. I would rather have them focus on what they have and expand their production, cost and sales region at the moment.

[–] cmhe 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If ARM is a small market, RISC-V is even smaller.

I personally like when boundaries are pushed, and welcome more independence on x86.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but there's no license fees for RISC-V, so they need to sell less volume to be profitable.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)