United States | News & Politics

2349 readers

883 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

150

To help pay for Trump tax cuts, new taxes on worker benefits become GOP target (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

KEY POINTS

House Republicans are considering treating work benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms as a new source of taxable income to help pay for President Trump’s tax cuts.

These tax proposals are still in the early stages and other aspects of Trump’s tax promises would help workers, such as tax breaks on tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits.

The concept of taxing employee perks has been debated before in Congress and never made it far, but with the size of the deficit and Trump wanting trillions of dollars in expiring and new tax cuts, some budget pay-fors will need to be found, and this one would dip into workers’ pockets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bahbah23 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I tried to track down some information for the US, but it seems like the tax code around it is incredibly complicated and it's been a long time since I had a job where any kind of "gift" was given.

In my somewhat limited experience, American corporations tend to look at employee related expenses holistically, so regardless of who writes the tax check and how the paperwork is shuffled, the expense is considered roughly the same.

Edit: to tie into my original comment, it means that the company has decided what it has budgeted for employees, and any additional taxes would come out of future compensation adjustments and/or reduction in staff instead of showing up as a line item on the paycheck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

yeah so that all makes sense. i think though that what that would mean is when they reshuffle and things wash out, people will end up with a higher salary and fewer benefits than they would have otherwise

that also makes it much easier for employees to evaluate new jobs directly on compensation rather that foggy benefits