this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)
rpg
3210 readers
15 users here now
This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs
Rules (wip):
- Do not distribute pirate content
- Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
- Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
- Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
- Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
- Do not advertise for livestreams
- Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
- Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
- No Zak S content.
- Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Eh, we've tried it, but the skills being tied together and to the sanity meters ruined character builds, so it just wasn't fun. We've kept the idea of making connected characters (just an ally and a rival) because it makes for excellent plot hooks, but otherwise went back to 2nd Ed.
They do, but in a way that I think felt limiting. You can't have too many identities without making them quite weak, and then you have limited slots to have them do something cool or just substitute for skills/stress checks.
There's also the feeling that your character can't progress at anything outside their identities, because progress in one skill is regression in another and is entirely at the fate of a dice roll.
I'm sure it's great for other people's playstyles, it's just not my cup of tea.