this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
150 points (96.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3687 readers
469 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are enough warheads on both sides that no "first strike" could get all or even most. It's lose/lose any time.

[–] PugJesus 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Look, I'm not saying we wouldn't get our hair mussed...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just watched the British film 'Threads' about a nuclear exchange. Idk, how much nuclear winter will we need to counteract the global heating over the last 50 years?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Nuclear winter doesnt exist so ww3 is not the solution.