this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
63 points (97.0% liked)

Australia

3620 readers
71 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thought provoking post. I want to do everything possible to help address aboriginal issues. But I would have preferred they trial the voice for a couple of years first to see if it works and iron out any issues. Then if it's a success, use that as evidence why it should be added to the constitution. It seems wild to commit to something before we've really tried it.

[–] Mountaineer 5 points 1 year ago

It seems wild to commit to something before we’ve really tried it.

https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2223/Quick_Guides/FormerAboriginalandTorresStraightIslanderRepresentativeBodies#:~:text=Previous%20Australian%20Government%2Dappointed%20advisory,2019).

There's been lots, either recognised or appointed by the government over the years.
And whenever they become inconvenient (publicly saying things the Government doesn't want the public to hear), the Government of the day dismisses them.

The whole point here is to institute a body that can

  1. Speak in parliament - which means whatever they say will be permanently a matter of record.
  2. Not get shut down the moment they are inconvenient.

The Government of the day doesn't have to do what The Voice says and the The Voice has no veto - but they do have to publicly acknowledge what has been said to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That being said, I'll still vote yes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)