Comic Strips

13356 readers

4252 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

[email protected]: "I use Arch btw"
[email protected]: memes (you don't say!)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lawrence

436

Not well liked (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago by bruh_duh to c/comicstrips

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Technically yes, but practically no for the first question. Properly stored nuclear waste has very minimal radiation leakage.

As for the second, it's complicated. The actual amount of radioactive waste is less than 10,000 cubic meters. There's quite a bit more than that of just water that has become toxic due to radiation, but the storage requirements of that are much lower. Here's a rough infographic: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-all-the-nuclear-waste-in-the-world/

Also, while The low level waste would still fit in a single square mile if you were restricted to that, using natural caves is a lot cheaper and easier than building tanks, so it's not exactly a realistic solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the detailed reply.

So basically it's as safe as you trust the fail rate to be. Which isn't super risky, provided you can trust your construction.