this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
10 points (61.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

711 readers
336 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

FYI @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] and a few others

A rage bait post they just restored: https://lemmy.world/post/24282976. The initial removal was about rule 3 - no rage baiting. That rule has been removed.

Another rage bait comment against vegans: https://lemmy.world/comment/14535452

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think this can be a place to post the most daft stuff vegans say, ideally with links.

I will start with

"Cows, pigs, sheeps, etc. are raped (no consent) and sexually assaulted (against their will) for dairy, meat, wool..."

https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/15551150

🤣🤣🤣

No they don't, even the linked thread had Felix (who was the mod of the carnivore community linked) making fun of vegans for being against this. You think Felix is an isolated incident? Because they are not, I've heard the same sentiments expressed by many people both online and IRL. If everyone supposedly opposes this, then why haven't animal agriculture practices changed?

In that thread, someone else said:

That's okay. There are many people who only know their food as a bite-sized anonymous mass from the supermarket. who think that cows just give milk all the time. They don't know how piglets are bred. That you can walk into any barn and see unfathomable suffering in every corner. Who have never heard of forceful impregnation, confinement crates, premature separation, tail docking, mulesing, torture breeding, teeth clipping, CO2 chambers, castration, steroid growth, veal crates, tethering, weaning rings, induced moulting, sheep dipping... and we haven't even started on the illegal cruelties.

In this state of blissful ignorance, you might regard someone who associates eating a steak with rape as crazy.

I used to be like this too. And to be honest, there are times when I wish I could return to it and just dismiss vegans with a downvote as exaggerating and annoying.

Surely if everyone thought that abusing animals was wrong, all the companies selling animal products that resulted from said abuse would be gone. But people don't actually care and just buy whatever from the store, directly supporting the abuse. People may "oppose" it theoretically but in practice don't. Even the US government "solved" the problem by making it a crime to film what is actually happening in those places (ag-gag laws) since businesses were losing profit when their cruel practices were exposed.

But I know I am wasting my time with you in particular, you spout nonstop carnist apologia. You insist there is 0 suffering during animal agriculture and that veganism doesn't help animals - not even in a supply and demand way. There isn't a way to actually talk to you about this or veganism in general because we will go around in circles accomplishing nothing. I am vegan, you are incredibly carnist. So, please disengage so I can move on with my day.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

please disengage so I can move on with my day.

Lemmy supports blocking users

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Note to both @[email protected] and @[email protected] for the future. 1. Respect people asking you to disengage in this instance. Just stop replying. Likewise if you want someone to disengage, don't also write a wall of text to which they might feel they need to reply. Just reply with disengage.

Finally, this is an official warning that this discussion seems to have run its course and is devolving into a flamewar. I can't just lock one thread, so please just stop replying to each other or I'll have to issue a 1-day ban.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Respect people asking you to disengage in this instance. Just stop replying. Likewise if you want someone to disengage, don’t also write a wall of text to which they might feel they need to reply. Just reply with disengage.

if this is an instance-wide rule, it should be stated in the main sidebar. it's not a deal breaker for me, but I strongly feel people should be encouraged to use the block feature, rather than getting the power to decide who is allowed to participate in a discussion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ye I should probably add smt. Just a lot to do.

The point of the disengage is that sometimes you might not necessarily want to block a person. Blocking still allows them to talk shit about you without you seeing it for example. The disengage is a way to say "ok, let's agree to disagree before things get (more) flamey" in a succinct and official manner. You don't always want to block everyone you get into a heated argument with, so there's good to have a way to disengage where neither party feels like they have to have the final word.

I hope lemmy at some point would give us a way to lock individual comment threads.

[–] lemonmelon 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Disengage should only be enforceable if it's invoked in good faith. Posting a wall of text and using it to get the last word forfeits any protection it provides. It's the equivalent of calling for a fair catch in American football, then attempting a return.

Immediate edit: it doesn't even have to be a wall of text. Any response included with the disengage request invites further discussion and suggests that there is a desire to continue the conversation, at least to the extent of having the final say.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what I said already, yes

[–] lemonmelon 0 points 1 week ago

Great, then we see eye to eye on it. I think it needs to be made as explicit as it possibly can be, so I responded with my own thoughts. It's wonderful to know that more than one person can share a viewpoint.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am already aware, thanks for the reminder :) When someone says to disengage, it means they want to stop the conversation because it is not worth any more of their time.

I think animals are tortured in the industry, you do not, I think people not buying meat can cause a change, you do not. What more is there to say? Nothing. So kindly, please disengage and stop messaging me 3 times at once, 1 message is fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

don't tell me what to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

veganism doesn't help animals - not even in a supply and demand way

supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has nothing to do w with whether buying beans helps animals.. which it doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You insist there is 0 suffering during animal agriculture

I never did that