this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
252 points (98.8% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

6030 readers
141 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dohpaz42 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I believe OP was referring to the space lost after the drive is formatted. Maybe?

[–] jordanlund 3 points 1 week ago
[–] theunknownmuncher 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The difference between what the OS reports and the marketing info on the product (GBs of difference) is almost entirely due to the different units used, because the filesystem overhead will only be MBs in size.

Also the filesystem overhead is not lost or missing from the disk, you're just using it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

When a drive is close to full capacity, those MBs lost due to units or secondary partitions from the format are the least of the worries. It's time for an additional or larger drive, or look at what is taking so much space.