this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
347 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

10243 readers
606 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Unpopular opinion: the candidate shouldn't have asked any of those questions. Those are offer negotiations because you can trade off salary for parking etc.

That first interview is a chance to be strategic and ask about growth in the department or development pathways/programs. I was always told that first you get the ring, then you negotiate the prenup.

[โ€“] TheDoozer 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Some of them maybe, but asking the working hours, the health insurance, and whether the company will wait or buy out the two months might be complete deal-breakers, and saves both sides time by asking up front (and for the first two, should have been offered up front prior to the interview, to prevent wasted time).

It's like being offended if, on a first date, one person asks if the other ever wants to have kids. If you know the long term potential is dependent on something, getting that question out there up front saves both parties, and anybody getting upset over it is scamming (getting them invested before being willing to discuss it). Same as not talking about general (not specific) payscale for the position, medical coverage, hours, or whatever until the second or third interview.

load more comments (2 replies)