this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
122 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

35113 readers
145 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shit in -> shit out ๐Ÿ“ค

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kromem 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the ideal would probably be to train a discriminator based on human ratings of generated outputs.

Take generation 0 (G0), produce output which is accepted or rejected based on humans, train a discriminator to predict those ratings off output, and then use the combined accepted outputs from humans and trained discriminator to train G1.

Repeat again for G1, G2, G3, etc.

My guess would be that the end result would continue to get better and better rather than worse.

The problem is if the diffusion model can't properly reject weird hands or pupils, those magnify in subsequent rounds.

But there's likely adaptive and maladaptive tendencies in the diffusion model, and adding a halfway decent filter between human selection and synthetic selection of outputs separate from the diffusion model itself would effectively curb the magnification here.

[โ€“] Ryantific_theory 2 points 1 year ago

It seems like a simple enough fix, though also setting a weird precedent. Instead of directly fixing things, just keep adding layers of machine learning to produce improved outputs.

The future of AI isn't spaghetti code, but spaghetti AI chains lol. Probably why people much smarter than me are the ones working on machine learning.