this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
710 points (83.9% liked)

Privacy

32753 readers
1484 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an unexpected mask off "secure" email and VPN provider Proton took the stance of siding with the fascist MAGA Reps. Proton's services are no option for me and many others any longer. Let's collect and discuss alternatives (E2E encrypted email and VPN) here ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ‘‡

Always try to provide:

-Server location (jurisdiction)

-Governance

-Integrity/trustworthiness/transparency

-User experience/ease of use (grade 1 to 10, lets take Proton as a benchmark with an 8)

-Pricing and links

If you know alternative setups, feel free to share, too.

#ProtonExodus

Background: https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116

Edit:typo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -5 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Wow, lots of people on Lemmy just look at screenshots of text and dont read anything anymore.

I dont think he said anything controversial. Read what he wrote.

He's not supporting Trump or the Republican party in general. He is calling them out for selecting someone good on antitrust. That's not controversial.

[โ€“] enbyecho 4 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Wow. Can you let us know what you are smoking so we know to avoid it?

[โ€“] LotrOrc 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'm confused honestly - the post I saw just said that he was happy that Trump picked an anti trust person to break up big tech.

Why is that bad? Don't people want the big monopolies broken up?

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Again, no! The post was emphatically not just a remark on the nomination being good (why tf do people keep saying that).

Their comment was an overall assessment of R's vs D's and their respective records on regulating the tech sector in general. It rubbed people the wrong way because it's an obviously crazy revisionist history from someone we all expected would know better.

[โ€“] Maggoty 4 points 5 days ago

Because it's not in good faith. And saying Trump is good for trust busting is revisionist history at best.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Monopolies are not going to be broken up. Get real.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)