Hacker News

555 readers

418 users here now

RSS Feed of HackerNews

founded 4 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

The Origins of Wokeness (paulgraham.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

One aspect of social media that surprised almost everyone at first was the popularity of outrage. Users seemed to like being outraged. We're so used to this idea now that we take it for granted, but really it's pretty strange. Being outraged is not a pleasant feeling. You wouldn't expect people to seek it out. But they do. And above all, they want to share it. I happened to be running a forum from 2007 to 2014, so I can actually quantify how much they want to share it: our users were about three times more likely to upvote something if it outraged them.

Were people actually outraged less frequently before social media? "Viral" outrage was limited to spreading through in-person interactions, but there was still mass media designed to generate outrage.

[–] jrs100000 2 points 3 weeks ago

It was less frequent and was normally more personal. You might be outraged by something you or someone you knew directly experienced. Occasionally something outrageous would make it into the local paper or news and everyone in your area could be mad about that together, and once every few generations youd have something like Pearl Harbor or 9/11 that made the whole country lose their minds. Celebrity gossip rags were the closest thing to the modern grind of everyone reacting to the latest crazy thing the stupidest person Washington said today, and those wernt taken very seriously by most people.