this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

Historical Artifacts

789 readers
47 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The mounting of this piece is interesting to me. It is kinda hard to tell, but it looks as if there is a needless long point at the tip of the blade, which has been inserted into some kind of acrylic piece to hold it upright. I wonder if that was added for display purposes (which in a way seems like irreparably harming the artifact), or if the original intended shape is just odd.

[–] PugJesus 2 points 1 month ago

Display purposes, probably. I hope they know how to do such things without harming the artifacts, but unfortunately, not all pieces of antiquity are given the care and expertise they deserve, so I couldn't guarantee anything about this piece, which I believe is part of a private collection.

[–] Daviedavo 2 points 4 weeks ago

The picture is too low res to tell for sure, but I believe what you are actually seeing is a rod that comes out of the base, runs behind the sword, and has a cradle at the top to hold the sword just under the guard (the two shiny bits of metal).