this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

homelab

482 readers
3 users here now

homelab

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why I'm dabbling in this is a very long story, but lets assume I only have 2 servers at my disposal and want Windows Server VMs providing SMB shares without a single point of failure. Proxmox and HyperV are my options for hypervisors.

Ceph is out for a few reasons, most notably only having 2 servers, 1Gb networking and the Windows Server VM would still be a single point of failure. I've been reading up on Windows Storage Spaces and if I'm understanding correctly it seems I could cluster 2 physical or virtual servers, replicate the data between the 2 and present the SMB share as the cluster name/IP rather than individual servers.

Before I spend too much time setting up Windows clusters, are there any other options I should be looking into?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

https://docs.gluster.org/en/main/Administrator-Guide/GlusterFS-Introduction/

I've heard good things about glusterfs.
Never used it tho, I just go with ceph

[โ€“] zhill29 1 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like Gluster also requires 3 servers.