datahoarder
Who are we?
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.
-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread
view the rest of the comments
How about 16TB for 140?
https://serverpartdeals.com/collections/hard-drives/products/seagate-exos-x16-st16000nm000g-16tb-7-2k-rpm-sata-6gb-s-512e-4kn-sed-3-5-refurbished-hdd
That’s pretty good, but that drive is refurbished.
Oh sorry I didn't realize the ebay post was for a new drive. I just automatically assumed ebay was used/refurbished as well. My bad this doesn't compare as I was expecting.
I bought four of those drives from SPD to put in my NAS. After testing and burn in, one of them started failing tests. SPD had me send the failing drive in and they sent me a new one. Otherwise these have been great so far.
Editing this 10 days later, having two more drives fail SMART tests after a sudden sharp increase in offline uncorrectable sectors. I'm trying to go through the RMA process now. I can no longer recommend this unless you're okay playing the RMA game until you get reliable drives. Backblaze tested the exact Seagate drives I'm using and only had a 0.60% annual failure rate. The fact that I'm seeing 3 out of 4 drives I've bought showing signs of failure makes me think something is wrong with the ones they're selling.