this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Hardware

973 readers
180 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can it topple x86 and Arm, or is the gap too wide to close?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Google's temporary retreat on RISC-V is a good example of the kind of basic stumbling block that a new architecture faces on the road towards mainstream - the lack of a mature and unified ecosystem. Most are familiar with the Arm ecosystem, with Qualcomm doing its thing in the laptop market currently with Windows on Arm devices, and Arm already has a foothold in the mobile ecosystem with companies such as MediaTek using the architecture to full effect within its flagship mobiles. But where does RISC-V potentially fit into the equation?

Even Microsoft and Qualcomm are having massive challenges with launching WoA and they've been at it for what seems like more than a decade. It's not only about the smartphone apps, but everything else that comes with it; the whole "supply chain" and ecosystem.