this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
1128 points (99.0% liked)

Accidental Renaissance

5542 readers
2 users here now

AccidentalRenaissance is for photos that look like Renaissance paintings.

This means that they look like Renaissance art in their composition, their coloring, their saturation, the angle of the scene, the types of settings, etc.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Must be a photo. Not a meme, drawing, art, ai-generated or ai-enhanced image, screenshot, low-effort post, meta posts, video, or anything else but a photo.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Must be SFW. No gore, porn, extreme violence, blood, corpses, or similarly disturbing content. Absolutely no pornography, even if it's "tasteful".

๐Ÿ‘‰ Comments must be civil. No slurs of any kind or using words to insult, demean, harass, or abuse other individuals or groups.

๐Ÿ‘‰ The Renaissance part (not the photo itself) must be accidental to the photograph. In other words, no photos of Renaissance fairs, people dressed in medieval/Renaissance clothes, etc.

๐Ÿ‘‰ NO influencer selfies, professional photoshoots with watermarks, any type of OnlyFans-like content. We are not the place to work your side-hustle.

๐Ÿ“ธ If you know who the photographer is, give them credit in the comment section. This is the only type of self-promotion we allow.

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿฆฏ Alt-Text for vision-impaired users in the post body or in the comments is highly encouraged. Just pretend you are describing a photo to someone on the phone.

๐Ÿค˜ Created by the former mod team of r/AccidentalRenaissance

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are different photos. The framing is different, the flames are different. Im not saying the posted one isnt altered, but the difference in appearance could just be from different cameras (quality, settings, etc).

[โ€“] disguy_ovahea 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Youโ€™re right. Someone pointed out in another post that itโ€™s just another frame from the same video, but without editing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But why do they invest work to make it worse?

[โ€“] disguy_ovahea 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Theyโ€™re very common mistakes.

The photo has some high ISO noise, so itโ€™s expected to use noise reduction. Too much will smooth away all of the texture, resulting in the oil painting-like appearance of the posted photo.

Bumping the contrast and saturation is a common way to make photos more dramatic. Theyโ€™re probably the most commonly overused and abused adjustments by novice photographers.

Itโ€™s just an example of too much of a good thing.