this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
501 points (98.5% liked)

Games

16985 readers
759 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kosanovskiy 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tbh valve could stop this by making it only tradeble to your friends or make the skins non tradable so they are just that, skins for you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But why would they? Trading skins is a big part of the game. I enjoy trading/selling/buying skins every now and then. There is nothing bad about being able to trade stuff.

The problem occurs when third party sellers abuse your platform - but why you would be mad at valve instead of those sellers is beyond me.

[–] kosanovskiy 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was throwing out a nuclear option showing that there are options. This is valve where best of the best work here, and implementing locked down trading can work to thr point they cut out the external trades or make it so hard to move the trade of thr platform that it would effectively kill the casino portion. Albeit this would hurt their earnings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Nuclear options rarely are the best ones, especially in a case where the harm caused doesn't even remotely warrant it.

Parents should keep an eye on their kids so this can't happen. That's what parents are supposed to do. Removing a good feature because "MUUUH THINK OF THE KIDS" is wrong.