this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
178 points (88.4% liked)

Bluesky

610 readers
1926 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anamnesis 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Campaigning with the daughter of a war criminal was not a good look, even if it didn't move Kamala right on any actual policy. It's perfectly reasonable to look askance at me if I'm out there doing campaign stops with Uday Hussein, even if I still support a $15 minimum wage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What crimes did his daughter commit?

[–] Anamnesis 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did I say she committed any crimes?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So she's just guilty by association? That's an unfortunate way to judge people.

What bad things did your parent do? I want to judge you for it.

[–] Dkarma 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're both Republicans so....yes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's ignorant. She's been critical of the Republican party for almost a decade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not many, but she campaigned for her war criminal father in 2004 so she at least didn't have issues with the principle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are the "not many" crimes she committed? List them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah fair enough. That should've been "none".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Props for admitting it. These people are scumbaggish enough, no need to make things up.

[–] Red_October 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, now compare "Campaigned with the daughter of a war criminal" to "Is a war criminal rapist felon con man with dementia." You're arguing that "Not a good look" is worse than "Possibly the actual Anti-Christ."

[–] Anamnesis 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You shouldn't assume that everyone who criticizes Kamala Harris' actions during the campaign supported Trump or didn't vote. That'd make you just as tribal and reactive as Trump supporters.

[–] Red_October 1 points 2 months ago

Either you voted for Harris or you didn't. This isn't tribal or reactive, this is a basic understanding of how the election works.