this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
833 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45911 readers
1660 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They can once they release that conviction but it goes to show ineptitude and malfeasance which casts doubt on any further attempt to convict someone. And yes it would, shadow of a doubt is a high standard and a second conviction is a huge amount of doubt.

Factual innocence is different, it's a positive defense for literally any criminal charge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There's no mechanism to release a conviction. Usually, if prosecutors have convicted somebody for murder, they won't pursue a case against a second person only for reason of not wanting to admit that they may have got it wrong. But there's no legal barrier, and it has happened for other crimes. The Ninth Circuit even ruled that it's legal.

[–] Madison420 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Reversed, released, overturned are all the same thing and happen literally daily. Where did you get your information that a conviction can't be changed?

Ed: reading your source it hinged on the crime technically being capable of being committed by multiple people and this one clearly can't be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, a conviction can be overturned, but what I'm pointing out here is that it doesn't have to be in order to convict somebody else for the same crime.

[–] Madison420 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. But you said there isn't a mechanism for it, there clearly is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And there isn't. If prosecutors file a new case against a second person for the same crime, and get a conviction, there's no mechanism by which that second conviction overturns the previous conviction. Depending on the circumstances, the first person convicted may not even have grounds to have their case brought before a court to be re-examined.

[–] Madison420 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Automatically? No, almost nothing but enhancements are automatic.

What I hear you saying it is not just possible but probable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Then I don't know what I can say more clearly. If they convict Mangione, and the real killer confesses, they can convict the real killer, too. They wouldn't even have to free Mangione to do it.

[–] Madison420 1 points 14 hours ago

They can't in this case.

In your example they essentially used the same basis as felony murder (which I don't agree with but whatever) in that they do not know who did pulled the trigger and made the enhancements threat but there's no argument both were there.

In this case there's only one person there during the shooting and that's on video, it physically and logically could not be two people and therefore two convictions are unlikely to hold.