this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
18 points (90.9% liked)

Jellyfin: The Free Software Media System

5885 readers
4 users here now

Current stable release: 10.10.3

Community Standards

Website

Forum

GitHub

Documentation

Feature Requests

Matrix (General Information & Help)

Matrix (Announcements)

Matrix (General Development)

Matrix (Off-Topic) - Come get to know the team and blow off steam!

Matrix Space - List of all the available rooms on Matrix.

Discord - Bridged to our Matrix rooms

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
18
Container vs service (self.jellyfin)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by SailorsLife to c/[email protected]
 

The last post on the subject I could find was a year ago. So thought I would ask again. I have debian 12 up on miniPC and I have my NAS mounted. My intention is to use jellyfin and some of the arr* stuff. I know only a little about systemd (I just google what I need to know). I have some contianer knowledge, but mostly in k8s. And the docker parts aren't really my problem. But I have a vague understanding of docker. What are the latest pros and cons of containers vs service installation?

Edit: The opinions were unanimous. Containers it is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SailorsLife 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you say "Backup your docker config folders". Are you talking about the directory were you would store the dockerfile / docker compose file?

[–] CodeMonkeyUK 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That too, but no, I was referring to the data/config folders for each container.

For example, radarr it would be the config volume you mounted. Generally, the *arrs use a volume called 'config', but other containers will differ.

I've only had to recover from backups twice in 5 years, once was my fault after fiddling with databases. But if you're using the development/nightly branches, it's best to be cautious and avoid having to reconfigure.

[–] SailorsLife 1 points 1 week ago

oh, gotcha. Thanks, and good point. I was thinking of using bind mounts instead of volumes so I can access them easier. That should make backing them up to the NAS easier as well.