this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
99 points (95.4% liked)
News
70 readers
2 users here now
Anything related to the news. We will not abuse our mod power to censor you like the other news communities.
founded 1 month ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Based on the evidence, I'd say he's not guilty.
The weirdest part to me would be why he'd write a manifesto to "save the police time" and then not plead guilty
Because he has more to say.
If he was trying to genuinely get away with it, he would have destroyed the gun, not written the manifesto, worn a disguise...
Unless that is all fabricated evidence. Im not even trying to meme here. Some of the "facts" and evidence about this case are odd and suspicious.