this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
563 points (98.5% liked)

Nonsense

0 readers
8 users here now

funny, silly, whatevs.

Rules

keep it comedic

founded 2 months ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 20 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Those people are still objectively wrong though. If you're not moving faster than other cars get the fuck out of the left lane.

[–] franklin 14 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I would reword this perhaps, I would say to give it a more nuanced perspective that you shouldn't be in the left lane if you aren't passing and by preventing others from passing you are creating a hazard

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I mean if you aren't moving faster than the other cars then you're clearly not passing them. So it still fits it's just a less nice way of saying that.

[–] PapaStevesy 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not less nice, it's less accurate.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How? If you're not moving faster then you're not passing. So if you're in what's called the "passing lane" and you're not moving faster than a car to your right then you're not passing. It fits either way. Even if you call it the fast lane it's still the same concept. "If you're not moving faster get out of the fast lane" is just as accurate as "If you're not passing get out of the passing lane"

[–] PapaStevesy 1 points 2 months ago

Shouldn't you call it the "faster lane" then?

I was more disputing the "less nice" thing, I don't see how calling it the fast lane is "meaner" than calling it the passing lane. But objectively it is less accurate to the purpose of the lane. I do definitely really care about this though, it's a globally critical distinction lol

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)