this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
24 points (96.2% liked)

Hardware

758 readers
142 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If they're not willing to make changes to the memory implementation on the 5060 this doesn't seem that unreasonable tbh. 10-12 with all else being equal on the 5060 would be nice, of course, but $X and 8GB is probably a better market fit than $X+40ish (?) and 16GB.

But that also might be a slightly too convenient way to justify not just tweaking the memory configuration to be a better fit for >8GB but <16GB, so idk lol. I don't keep up as closely with low level details anymore (e.g., what memory chips are commonly available right now), so it's hard for me to crucify or defend the choice to avoid a memory config change with much conviction.