Greentext

4591 readers

879 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

756

Anon is an ally (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp 93 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Let's crunch the numbers, would it be financially sensible to pay for m to f transition of Employees, so you can pay them less in the long run?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With 27% pay cut and the employee having a 3000/month salary and them working a decade in most cases yes

[–] Taalnazi 1 points 2 days ago

Hold up, doesn't that depend on the transition costs?

load more comments (6 replies)