this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
51 points (80.0% liked)
World News
32492 readers
575 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Huge amounts of low quality websites being posted here now. I've never heard of Mint Press news so I looked them up -
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sources, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.1)
Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8)
Country: USA
MBFCโs Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Edit - ha ha didn't realise it was .ml ๐
I thought I blocked you spastics
๐คโ๏ธ uh ackchually my media aggregator website says your website is bad!
If you want to be a redditor so bad go back to reddit
Here's an exercise for you that may require critical thinking (which evidently, you seem very averse to): Can you list out things that are invalid, dishonest and/or blatantly false in the article? Ensure to quote the parts that fit this category of "invalid, dishonest and/or false" and justify why, while citing sources that you believe to not be in this category.
If anglos actually wanted to read and check sources they wouldn't go for factuality meter websites lmao
MBFC is the lowest quality website around: literally just some random right wing jerk offs opinion. Yet liberals treat it like unquestionable holey scripture because it confirms their bias
Is it conspiracy that US hates Maduro/Venezuela???
Critical thinking is too difficult, so its best to let zionist bloggers tell you what's factual. /s
Mintpress is one of the best sites for independent journalism, Pulitzer winner Chris Hedges constantly contributes and Alan MacLeod does amazing investigative work.
Not their fault you think doing stenography for the State Department and naming "anonymous sources" is as far as good journalism goes. Keep to your corporate propaganda washing and let the rest of us actually read and check the evidence.
Just now?