this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
136 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7517 readers
294 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sensiblepuffin 12 points 2 months ago (8 children)

But that makes no sense. It's an auction. There's a time limit. It's not an acquisition. You're being forced to sell something.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

You know what else makes no sense? Letting someone bid on his former property using money he owes to the people selling.

[–] sensiblepuffin -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Why does that make no sense? He has debts to pay, can't cover them, and so his assets are sold at auction to pay them off. Same thing happens to people every day via civil forfeiture.

Edit: clearly people cannot read. The Onion should have been sold the website for the winning bid that they submitted at an auction. End of story.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 5 points 2 months ago

Because he's trying to use the money he owes to buy back his stuff, when it should have been seized too

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)