this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
872 points (98.3% liked)

interestingasfuck

6101 readers
1 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rational_lib 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

This is a silly ad hominem argument though, an indication that what he's arguing against is too valid to refute on its own merits.

Violence solves things. But by the powerless? No, historically speaking that just leads to military action, often followed by mass executions. Fighting fascism with violence is like fighting fire with gasoline. They feed off that shit. Maybe you can argue it worked in Haiti, albeit with a lot of help from yellow fever. But have you been to Haiti?

He's right that peaceful protests never solve anything. But organizing and acting as a bloc solves a lot. General strikes, civil disobedience, boycotts, even voting as a group has a strong track record of changing things.

[–] Jericho_One 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I want to believe that peaceful organization like civil disobedience leads to change, but I can't recall seeing that work in recent history...

[–] rational_lib -5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How recent is recent? Tunisia, Egypt (well until the population turned out to be too dumb for democracy anyway) are examples.

It hasn't worked in the US because it's been too half-assed and the existence of democratic options lowers incentives. Contrast the successful civil disobedience during the civil rights era, where the right to participate in elections was one of the things being denied. But with the increasing signs that democracy is being controlled by a few billionaires, it may see a comeback.

[–] trashgirlfriend 4 points 6 days ago

well until the population turned out to be too dumb for democracy anyway

Liberals when

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)