this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
16 points (86.4% liked)
Wikipedia
1808 readers
305 users here now
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
- Only links to Wikipedia permitted
- Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
- Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails
- On Casual Tuesdays, we allow submissions from wikis other than Wikipedia.
Recommended:
- If possible, when submitting please delete the "m." from "en.m.wikipedia.org". This will ensure people clicking from desktop will get the full Wikipedia website.
- Use the search box to see if someone has previously submitted an article. Some apps will also notify you if you are resubmitting an article previously shared on Lemmy.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like he is equal parts stupid and based. That's kind of why this article appealed to me.
Yeah some of it I could potentially see where he’s coming from too, hence the curiosity. I have a family member that cites his views often so don’t know how much is accurately being portrayed.
Edit: I read this wrong, pls ignore (leaving up for context for the response)
You’re right, this is a fucking roller coaster
Dude, to explain why religion is better than science, you chose a “scientific” antimasturbation movement? I hate to break it to you, but the god of Abraham is also famously against onanism.
But the rest of that is hella based.
He is criticizing anti-masturbation campaigns, not supporting them
Yeah, I misinterpreted that as being pro religion, anti pseudoscientific antimasturbation campaigns, but it’s against both of those. My brain read this:
As this:
Which paints the whole thing in a different light. This whole section is actually green and yellow flags, the red ones are elsewhere.
Lol this article is weirdly written. I didn't notice that either before you mentioned it.