this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
16 points (86.4% liked)

Wikipedia

1808 readers
305 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
16
Thomas Szasz (en.m.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 month ago by Emerald to c/wikipedia
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emerald 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like he is equal parts stupid and based. That's kind of why this article appealed to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah some of it I could potentially see where he’s coming from too, hence the curiosity. I have a family member that cites his views often so don’t know how much is accurately being portrayed.

[–] idiomaddict 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Edit: I read this wrong, pls ignore (leaving up for context for the response)

You’re right, this is a fucking roller coaster

Szasz was a critic of the influence of modern medicine on society, which he considered to be the secularization of religion's hold on humankind. Criticizing scientism, he targeted psychiatry in particular, underscoring its campaigns against masturbation at the end of the 19th century, its use of medical imagery and language to describe misbehavior, its reliance on involuntary mental hospitalization to protect society, and the use of lobotomy and other interventions to treat psychosis.[citation needed] Szasz consistently paid attention to the power of language in the establishment and maintenance of the social order, both in small interpersonal and in wider social, economic, and/or political spheres.

Dude, to explain why religion is better than science, you chose a “scientific” antimasturbation movement? I hate to break it to you, but the god of Abraham is also famously against onanism.

But the rest of that is hella based.

[–] Emerald 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Criticizing scientism, he targeted psychiatry in particular, underscoring its campaigns against masturbation at the end of the 19th century

He is criticizing anti-masturbation campaigns, not supporting them

[–] idiomaddict 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I misinterpreted that as being pro religion, anti pseudoscientific antimasturbation campaigns, but it’s against both of those. My brain read this:

which he considered to be the secularization of religion's hold on humankind

As this:

which he considered to be the source of the secularization of religion's hold on humankind

Which paints the whole thing in a different light. This whole section is actually green and yellow flags, the red ones are elsewhere.

[–] Emerald 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

it’s against both of those

Lol this article is weirdly written. I didn't notice that either before you mentioned it.