this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
625 points (97.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

30000 readers
792 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[…] journalists write news, are you writing it down in an article afterwards?

If that is the accepted definition of journalism, then you are right I wouldn't fit (Wikipedia's definition, however, does state that sources are required when writing ^[1]^), but that isn't exactly the point that I was getting at by this post.

References

  1. "Journalist". Wikipedia. Published: 2024-12-10T06:50Z. Accessed: 2024-12-10T08:44Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalist.
    • §"Roles". ¶2.

      A reporter is a type of journalist who researches, writes and reports on information in order to present using sources. […]

[–] Gamoc 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok how are you fact checking, are you finding people with expertise and contacting them or googling and using whatever shite websites come up as a source? If the latter, how are you verifying the veracity of those sources?

And yes sources are required but that doesn't mean that's ALL that's required or you wouldn't have newspapers or organisations, just some people calling themselves journalists that have a bunch of sources, but nobody knows what for because they've never produced a piece of journalism for them to be of use.

The idea used to be that you find a news source that is the most reliable. Now half the world just finds the one that confirms their biases the most, and their biases are fucking stupid after decades of lies and education cuts from various rich cunts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

[…] The idea used to be that you find a news source that is the most reliable. Now half the world just finds the one that confirms their biases the most […]

How are you determining/measuring reliability?

[–] Gamoc 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Using what method? You seemed to be making a point that an "average person" isn't qualified to fact check claims when you said

Ok how are you fact checking, are you finding people with expertise and contacting them or googling and using whatever shite websites come up as a source? If the latter, how are you verifying the veracity of those sources?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

[…] how are you fact checking, are you finding people with expertise and contacting them or googling and using whatever shite websites come up as a source? […]

It depends on the context.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And yes sources are required but that doesn’t mean that’s ALL that’s required or you wouldn’t have newspapers or organisations, just some people calling themselves journalists that have a bunch of sources.

I agree that the existence of sources aren't themselves examples of journalism.