It turns any TV into a smart TV. Compared to just using the features built into a smart TV, it has a more capable processor, more timely updates with a longer lifetime, and possibly a wider selection of apps. Compared to using something like a game console or PC, it is smaller, more power-efficient, and (if the only feature you care about is streaming) has fewer unnecessary features.

[–] TheLowestStone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I use a laptop hooked up to my TV which is vastly superior in the most important way for me: ad blocking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How much did your laptop cost compared to something like a $199 Shield?

[–] TheLowestStone 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This one cost me about $300 refurbished because I also use it for some light gaming. The one I used prior to this one was $160.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The shield is a bit stronger than light gaming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

The shield isn't meant as a gaming device, it's a streaming device. I mean you can run games on it, I guess, but it's an Android device and its purpose is to stream from PC to your TV.

[–] TheLowestStone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, it isn't.

You can install emulators on the shield to play classic roms and you can stream games from your PC or the cloud to it. My laptop does both of those things. Plus I can install some modern games like Hades 2, block ads on every video and music streaming service, and be more in control of where my data goes.

I'm pretty sure the only thing the Shield does that my laptop won't is a.i. upscaling which is not an important feature for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Most people, when speaking about a gaming device, aren't talking about the ability to play things from 40 years ago that you could run on a smart toaster

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

That makes sense. I still can’t see the appeal of a bespoke solution, but at least I understand it