this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
199 points (96.3% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
3 users here now

Be respectful

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mackenzie Scott built Amazon alongside of Bezos. She didn’t inherit it nearly as much as she just got her split. She is just as complicit in what Amazon has become.

[–] Lumisal 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In fairness, I think she's been trying to give away nearly all her money to many charities. It's just that billions is such a huge amount it can literally take awhile to give it away.

If you've ever watched Brewster's Millions you'll see even that amount is hard to get rid of on purpose.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Her wealth actually grew. She gave away 17B and still came out 2B above the starting number. I don't think it's possible for a billionaire to give it all away. Not without just throwing the bulk of the stock shares at someone.

[–] Lumisal 2 points 1 week ago

Yup. That's why such wealth can only really be controlled by the government. When you're that rich, even actively trying to give it away is difficult because the way the system is set up, you can literally make a ton of money by just having it sit in a bank.

Even giving the shares away isn't really giving away the money - it's just making someone else extremely wealthy instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the documentary Brewster’s Millions