this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

759 readers
293 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When asked whether 18A is more geared towards high-performance compute (HPC) applications than anything else, Chandrasekaran said this was "absolutely right."

"There are certain aspects of 18A that's extremely powerful for compute applications, especially the backside power. It's going to be very beneficial for compute applications."

But he added that all the "learning" from implementing that process node will go into its successor technology, 14A.

"So as 14A comes in, there will be a broader market that 14A will address, including compute and mobile and other applications and also how the PDKs (process design kits) are done so that it's not just for with Intel, but it's also focused on the broader ecosystem taking 14A and applying it to their designs," Chandrasekaran said.

Does this mean 18A will be relegated to high margin server CPU (and some high-end consumer desktop/mobile SKUs?)