this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
92 points (98.9% liked)

Hardware

758 readers
142 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Alphane_Moon
CSFFlame
92
Microsoft confirms zero chance Win11 supports older hardware (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Alphane_Moon to c/hardware
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought that was happening now, not past-tense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

English is very limited when it comes to verb forms, so it tends to reuse them for different purposes.

In this case I don't think it's actually being used as past tense, more like a conditional, or hypothetical (not sure those are the right words, but I hope you get what I mean).

Sure, “isn't” would probably work too, but I think using “wasn't” might probably sound better to a native speaker (I wouldn't know, English is my third language, but I think I've seen this form much more often than the present one), though it might depend on specific dialects...