this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1564 readers
466 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

liquids are more precious than printer ink, but that's not because ink is expensive to make. How can HP— and its handful of competitors in the highly concentrated printer market—get away with charging these kinds of markups?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Two printers. One costs 3x+ more than the other.

Ink for the cheap printer: $54 for 440 pages of black and since the cartridge combines color and black, you have to throw the extra ink out.

Ink for the expensive printer: $14 for 6000 pages. I couldn’t even find the official Epson ink since there are so many third party options. Epson doesn’t have to lock down their ink because you paid full price for their printer.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had a chance to get an Epson last week and I bought an HP instead because it advertised more ink in the box. "Great," thinks I, "I'll never likely print 3000 pages, and I'll just throw it away if I ever do. Suckers!!"

I get it and I find out that it's bricked until you register an account and it calls home; won't print unless it's signed up to auto-order new ink. I'm sure there are ways of ameliorating this, but they got me. They fucking got me. I knew it was a scam, I thought I was smarter, but nope, they got me. Fuckers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

time to return a clearly defective product. boomerang that crap right back at the store/mfcr.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have what's basically the HP version of that second printer. It was easy to set up, works well, and still hasn't run out of its initial ink after over a year of moderate printing. You definitely get what you pay for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I bought a color laser printer (HP) and got a 3rd party toner, if I run out - because it's a local company doing recycling and so on

I'm now even a bit ashamed, because I can't really support this local company, because I haven't had the chance to even put their toner in, as the initial ones still work now after fucking 6 years. And we even had some time, when we tried printing some photos in high quality (and corresponding paper)

Don't know how long it will hold up, but as I've pretty much moved to a paperless office, this initial toner kit will probably survive longer than my company...